A writer at PJMedia comes to the shocking conclusion that musical skill no longer matters in music...
http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2012/05/21/american-idol-accidentally-telling-the-truth/#comments
Longtime conductor of the Chicago Symphony, Georg Solti, was once asked
why he didn’t program more modern repertoire. Solti’s response was, I
thought, illuminating: all of us reach a point in our lives where the
music we already know is sufficient for
us and forms the basis of what we cherish, and we lose the ability to
truly appreciate anything (stylistically) newer. Solti said, for him,
music stopped sometime around 1950. So, yes to Bartok, Hindemith,
Prokofiev, and Shostakovich; no to Stockhausen, Lutoslawski, Carter, and
Xenakis.
I notice the same sort of thing in pop/rock music.
For me, music stopped sometime around 1980. So, yes to Gerry Rafferty,
Dire Straits, Supertramp, Robert Palmer, and ZZTop; no to Madonna, Pat
Benatar, the Culture Club, rap, crap, and hip-hop.
Once upon a
time, a musician did not need to be charismatic to sell a good tune, but
it helped. Elvis was king, but there was also Roy Orbison and Bobby
Darin, neither man being a sexual god. Barbra, for crying out loud, was
no beauty queen, though Barbra might disagree. What I’m seeing nowadays
is the opposite situation: the music has become a mere vehicle for the
charisma (such as it is). Britney Spears is not a musician or even a
particularly talented singer, and the songs? If you’ve heard one,
you’ve heard ‘em all. Britney Spears shakes her butt and the music helps
with the packaging. That makes her a butt shaker, not a singer.
No comments:
Post a Comment